Certified Valuation Analyst (CVA) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Certified Valuation Analyst Exam. Enhance your skills with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, complete with hints and explanations. Begin your journey to becoming a certified professional!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is typically NOT expected to be included in a valuation engagement report regarding opposing counsel?

  1. Approaches used by the opposing valuator

  2. Market analysis

  3. Financial statements

  4. Risk assessments

The correct answer is: Approaches used by the opposing valuator

In a valuation engagement report, it is typically not expected to include specific details about the approaches used by opposing counsel's valuator. Valuation reports primarily focus on presenting the valuation analyst's own analysis, methods, and conclusions rather than the methodologies or approaches employed by the opposition. The purpose of the report is to provide a clear and comprehensive understanding of the analyst's valuation process, the rationale behind their assessment, and the findings derived from their work. In contrast, market analysis, financial statements, and risk assessments are fundamental components of a thorough valuation engagement report. Market analysis provides context regarding the economy and specific industry trends relevant to the subject being valued. Financial statements offer critical quantitative data that underpin the valuation conclusions presented in the report. Risk assessments are essential for understanding the various uncertainties and potential factors that could influence the value conclusion, highlighting the valuation analyst's considerations regarding the risks inherent in the business or asset being evaluated. Thus, while the report aims to present a well-rounded view of the valuation, the details of opposing counsel's valuator's approaches are extraneous to the valuation analyst's own findings.